Categories: Enforcement, Import, International Trade, Investigation, Trade Policy, U.S. Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR)
Search
Categories
- Best Practices (156)
- Caribbean Basin Initiative (3)
- Countries (94)
- COVID-19 (9)
- PPE (1)
- Election 2020 (3)
- Enforcement (1)
- Events (61)
- Symposium (4)
- Expert (54)
- Export (172)
- GSP (2)
- HTSUS (23)
- Import (283)
- Counterfeits (20)
- Intellectual Property Rights (48)
- IPR, Trademarks and Logos (39)
- ISF (2)
- Labeling (10)
- penalty (10)
- Pre-compliance (81)
- International Business (91)
- International Law (152)
- International Trade (188)
- International Travel (46)
- Investigation (21)
- Jobs (2)
- MTB (1)
- OWIT (16)
- Speaking (26)
- Supply Chain (41)
- Technology (7)
- U.S Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (49)
- TSA (16)
- U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) (4)
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) (319)
- ACE (1)
- Brokers (1)
- CBP 28 (5)
- CBP 29 (5)
- CEE (3)
- CTPAT (21)
- Currency Seizure (10)
- Customs Broker (39)
- Customs Expert (119)
- Detention (15)
- Enforcement (82)
- Forced Labor (4)
- Freight Forwarding (6)
- Liquidated damages (6)
- Seizure (35)
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (1)
- U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) (28)
- AD/CVD (20)
- U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) (3)
- FCPA (2)
- U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) (1)
- U.S. Department of State (DOS) (14)
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (6)
- U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (1)
- U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (1)
- U.S. Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) (4)
- U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (5)
- CBD (5)
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) (3)
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (142)
- Bioterrorism Act (5)
- FDA Issues (123)
- Cosmetics (2)
- E-Cigarette (4)
- Food (51)
- FSMA (29)
- Gluten Free (3)
- Import Alert (30)
- Medical Devices (8)
- Tobacco (4)
- FDA Notice of Detention (7)
- Notice of Refusal (2)
- U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) (2)
- U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (1)
- U.S. Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) (77)
- China Trade War (62)
- Free Trade Agreement (10)
- List 4A (1)
- Special 301 (2)
- TPP (1)
- Trade Policy (4)
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (1)
- USMCA (6)
- NAFTA (6)
- Vehicles (4)
Archive
- April 2021 (7)
- March 2021 (8)
- February 2021 (6)
- January 2021 (9)
- December 2020 (13)
- November 2020 (6)
- October 2020 (9)
- September 2020 (6)
- August 2020 (4)
- July 2020 (4)
- June 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (4)
- April 2020 (4)
- March 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (3)
- November 2019 (2)
- October 2019 (5)
- September 2019 (3)
- August 2019 (5)
- July 2019 (3)
- June 2019 (6)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (5)
- February 2019 (2)
- January 2019 (4)
- December 2018 (3)
- November 2018 (3)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (6)
- July 2018 (7)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (6)
- April 2018 (5)
- March 2018 (2)
- February 2018 (3)
- January 2018 (7)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (2)
- October 2017 (4)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (3)
- July 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (4)
- May 2017 (3)
- April 2017 (8)
- March 2017 (3)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (6)
- December 2016 (4)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (2)
- April 2016 (2)
- March 2016 (1)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (2)
- December 2015 (2)
- November 2015 (2)
- October 2015 (3)
- September 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (3)
- June 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (4)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (4)
- October 2014 (6)
- September 2014 (1)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (4)
- June 2014 (2)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (1)
- December 2013 (2)
- November 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (3)
- September 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (1)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (2)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (9)
- February 2013 (5)
- January 2013 (4)
- December 2012 (4)
- November 2012 (3)
- October 2012 (7)
- September 2012 (5)
- August 2012 (6)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (3)
- March 2012 (4)
- February 2012 (8)
- January 2012 (5)
- December 2011 (5)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (6)
- July 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (4)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (3)
- December 2010 (2)
- November 2010 (4)
- October 2010 (2)
- September 2010 (3)
- August 2010 (7)
- July 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (2)
- May 2010 (5)
- April 2010 (4)
- March 2010 (4)
- February 2010 (6)
- January 2010 (7)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (7)
- October 2009 (9)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (9)
- May 2008 (1)
- July 2007 (1)
Proposed 25% Tariffs on Section 301 Digital Service Taxes – Comment Now
By Jennifer Diaz | April 1, 2021
Background on Section 301 Digital Service Taxes
In 2020, the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) initiated Section 301 investigations with respect to certain Digital Service Taxes (“DSTs”) being adopted or under consideration by a number of countries. DSTs are taxes on revenues that certain companies generate from providing certain digital services to users in those jurisdictions. According to USTR, available evidence suggests that DSTs are expected to target large, U.S.-based technology companies.
Section 301 of the U.S. Trade Act of 1974 authorizes the President to take all appropriate action including tariff-based and non-tariff-based retaliation to obtain the removal of any act, policy, or practice of a foreign government that violates an international trade agreement or is unjustified, unreasonable, or discriminatory, and that burdens or restricts U.S. commerce.
Accordingly, in early January 2021, USTR determined that certain countries’ DSTs were, in fact, unreasonable or discriminatory and burdened U.S. commerce. These countries included India, Italy, Turkey, Austria, Spain, and the United Kingdom. However, USTR has terminated DST investigations of Brazil, the Czech Republic, the European Union, and Indonesia after finding that these jurisdictions either have not adopted or not implemented a DST during the period of investigation. The reason for this termination is that USTR must make its determination within one year of initiation – or in this case June 2, 2021. However, these countries have only proposed, and have not yet implemented a Digital Service Taxes. Accordingly, USTR has decided to terminate these investigations, and to continue to monitor the creation DST in these countries.
Proposed 25% Duties
In its March 31, 2021 notice, USTR announced that it is moving forward with its DST investigations for the following countries:
USTR is proposing to impose 25% duties on a range of products from each of these countries. The initial proposed list includes a broad range of products including certain clothing, footwear and the like from Italy and Spain, Shrimp from India and Spain, Glassware and ceramics from Austria, Spain, and the UK, welding machines from Austria, industrial robots from the UK and optical goods from Austria. This list is not comprehensive.
Retaliatory tariffs could total almost $1 billion annually. The cumulative annual value of the duties comes to $880 million, according to Bloomberg News calculations, which include the following annual value of duties by country:
Comment Opportunity
USTR is soliciting public comment on the above proposed actions. To be assured of consideration, written comments should be submitted to USTR by April 30, 2021. USTR requests comments with respect to any issue related to the action to be taken in these investigations. USTR specifically invites comments regarding:
Virtual Hearing
Additionally, USTR will hold a virtual hearing on these proposed actions on the following dates:
Although the proposed actions pertaining to India and Austria are covered by the multi-jurisdictional virtual hearing, there is no virtual hearing country-specific for proposed actions pertaining to either of those two countries. In order to directly participate in the virtual hearing a request to appear and a summary of testimony must be provided to USTR by April 21, 2021.
Additionally, USTR is soliciting hearing rebuttal comments. Rebuttal comments for the multi-jurisdictional hearing are due on May 10, 2021, and rebuttal comments for country-specific hearings are due in the days after.
It is important to note that these lists are broader than the lists of products against which retaliation will be taken. USTR will decide which products are subject to retaliation and which products are not subject to retaliation based in large part on the comments and testimony filed in this proceeding. If you are importing a product potentially subject to such duties, it is very important that you file comments explaining why your products should not be selected.
Contact Us
Diaz Trade Law has extensive expertise on Section 301 actions and in preparing and submitting comments for federal rulemaking. Please reach out to us if you would like to submit comments to USTR in order to inform the agency of how to proceed with the DST investigations. If you would like more information on this issue, including a full list of the products proposed for each country, please contact us at your earliest convenience. Diaz Trade Law can be reached at info@diaztradelaw.com and 305-456-3830.