Categories: Best Practices, comments, Customs Expert, International Law, special 301, Trade War
Search
Categories
- 10+2 (3)
- ACE (1)
- AD/CVD (18)
- Alcohol (1)
- Apparel (5)
- AT (1)
- Best Practices (139)
- Bioterrorism Act (5)
- BIS (3)
- Brazil (2)
- Brokers (1)
- C-TPAT (20)
- Canada (1)
- Caribbean Basin Initiative (2)
- CBD (3)
- CBERA (2)
- CBI (2)
- CBP (193)
- CBP 28 (5)
- CBP 29 (5)
- CBTPA (2)
- CEE (3)
- China (52)
- China Trade War (54)
- comments (1)
- compliance (68)
- Counterfeit (17)
- COVID-19 (6)
- CPSC (4)
- Cuba (19)
- Customs Bond (4)
- Customs Expert (104)
- DDTC (1)
- Department of Homeland Security (36)
- department of state (13)
- detention (15)
- DHS (4)
- dietary supplement (2)
- DOC (7)
- DOJ (1)
- DOL (1)
- E-Cigarettes (3)
- EAR (2)
- ECCN (1)
- EEI (1)
- Election 2020 (3)
- Enforcement (65)
- EPA (6)
- Events (53)
- Expert (47)
- Export (152)
- FAA (1)
- FBI (1)
- FCPA (1)
- FDA (50)
- FDA Issues (106)
- Cosmetics (2)
- E-Cigarette (2)
- Food (50)
- FSMA (28)
- Gluten Free (3)
- Import Alert (23)
- Medical Devices (7)
- Tobacco (4)
- FDA Notice of Detention (7)
- Final Rule (7)
- FMC (4)
- Forced Labor (2)
- Form 766 (1)
- Free Trade Agreement (10)
- Freight Forwarding (6)
- FTA (2)
- FTC (1)
- GATS (1)
- GDP (1)
- Global Entry (2)
- GOLDMAN (1)
- Government shutdown (1)
- GSP (2)
- HTS (4)
- HTSUS (20)
- Import (217)
- Customs Broker (37)
- Import Alert (17)
- intellectual property rights (46)
- International Business (79)
- International Law (136)
- International Trade (166)
- International Travel (44)
- Investigation (18)
- IPR, Trademarks and Logos (42)
- Counterfeits (20)
- IRAN (1)
- ISA (2)
- ISF (2)
- ITAR (1)
- ITC (2)
- Jobs (2)
- Labeling (10)
- Lacey Act (1)
- license (9)
- Liquidated damages (6)
- List 4A (1)
- LVC (1)
- Medical Device (7)
- Mexico (1)
- Mitigation (4)
- MSRP (1)
- MTB (1)
- NAFTA (6)
- Notice of Refusal (2)
- OFAC (2)
- offline (1)
- OMB (1)
- OTC Drug (3)
- OWIT (10)
- OWIT-South Florida (6)
- penalty (10)
- petition (4)
- PGA (1)
- PHIB (1)
- PPE (1)
- pre-compliance (28)
- PREDICT (1)
- Professional Speaker (14)
- proposed rule (5)
- Protest (2)
- Reasonable Care (7)
- SEC (1)
- Seizure (33)
- Speaker (8)
- Speaking (25)
- special 301 (1)
- Supply Chain (36)
- Symposium (4)
- Technology (7)
- TPP (1)
- trade (62)
- Trade Transformation (4)
- Trade War (40)
- Trademark Recordation (7)
- Trusted Trader (3)
- TSA (16)
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2)
- U.S.Customs (111)
- Currency Seizure (9)
- Uncategorized (45)
- USDA (1)
- USITC (1)
- USMCA (3)
- USSF (1)
- USTR (3)
- Vehicles (3)
- Vietnam (1)
Archive
- January 2021 (5)
- December 2020 (13)
- November 2020 (6)
- October 2020 (9)
- September 2020 (6)
- August 2020 (4)
- July 2020 (4)
- June 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (4)
- April 2020 (4)
- March 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (3)
- November 2019 (2)
- October 2019 (5)
- September 2019 (3)
- August 2019 (5)
- July 2019 (3)
- June 2019 (6)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (5)
- February 2019 (2)
- January 2019 (4)
- December 2018 (3)
- November 2018 (3)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (6)
- July 2018 (7)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (6)
- April 2018 (5)
- March 2018 (2)
- February 2018 (3)
- January 2018 (7)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (2)
- October 2017 (4)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (3)
- July 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (4)
- May 2017 (3)
- April 2017 (8)
- March 2017 (3)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (6)
- December 2016 (4)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (2)
- April 2016 (2)
- March 2016 (1)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (2)
- December 2015 (2)
- November 2015 (2)
- October 2015 (3)
- September 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (3)
- June 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (4)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (4)
- October 2014 (6)
- September 2014 (1)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (4)
- June 2014 (2)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (1)
- December 2013 (2)
- November 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (3)
- September 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (1)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (2)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (9)
- February 2013 (5)
- January 2013 (4)
- December 2012 (4)
- November 2012 (3)
- October 2012 (7)
- September 2012 (5)
- August 2012 (6)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (3)
- March 2012 (4)
- February 2012 (8)
- January 2012 (5)
- December 2011 (5)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (6)
- July 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (4)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (3)
- December 2010 (2)
- November 2010 (4)
- October 2010 (2)
- September 2010 (3)
- August 2010 (7)
- July 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (2)
- May 2010 (5)
- April 2010 (4)
- March 2010 (4)
- February 2010 (6)
- January 2010 (7)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (7)
- October 2009 (9)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (9)
- May 2008 (1)
- July 2007 (1)
USTR Announces Special 301 Review – Comments Due January 28
By Jennifer Diaz | January 7, 2021
Special 301 Report
The United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) conducts an annual evaluation known as the Special 301 review. In the review, USTR identifies countries that deny adequate and effective protection of intellectual property (“IP”) rights or deny fair and equitable market access to U.S. persons who rely on IP protection. As a result of this review, trading partners that present the most significant concerns regarding IP rights are placed in one of three categories: 1) the Watch List, 2) the Priority Watch List, and 3) Priority Foreign Countries.
The ‘Watch List’ and ‘Priority Watch List’ categories are non-statutory categories. The Watch List is an administrative category created by USTR to designate countries that have intellectual property protection inadequacies that are less severe than those on the Priority Watch List, but still attract U.S. attention. Meanwhile, the Priority Watch List is an administrative category created by the USTR for those countries whose acts, policies, and practices warrant concern, but who do not meet all of the criteria for identification as Priority Foreign Country. The USTR may place a country on the Priority Watch List when the country lacks proper intellectual property protection and has a market of significant U.S. interest. If designated on the Priority Watch List, the USTR must develop an action plan with respect to that foreign country. If the President, in consultation with USTR, determines that the foreign country fails to meet the action plan benchmarks, then the President may take appropriate action with respect to the foreign country
In 2020, USTR designated the following countries under its Watch List:
In 2020, USTR designated the following countries under its Priority Watch List:
The third category, ‘Priority Foreign Country,’ is a statutory category and is the worst classification given in the Special 301 review process. A Priority Foreign Country designation is given to “foreign countries that deny adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights or fair and equitable marketing access to U.S. persons relying upon intellectual property rights protection. A statutory category for those designated by the USTR as having “the most onerous or egregious acts, policies or practices that deny intellectual property protection and limit market access to U.S. persons or firms depending on intellectual property rights protection” with the “greatest adverse impact (actual or potential) on the relevant United States products.” These countries may be investigated under section 301 provisions of the Trade Act of 1974.62 If a country is named as a “Priority Foreign Country,” the USTR must launch an investigation into that country’s IPR practices. The USTR may suspend trade concessions and impose import restrictions or duties, or enter into a binding agreement with the priority country that would eliminate the act, policy, or practice under scrutiny. In 2020, no country was identified as a Priority Foreign Country.
USTR Robert Lighthizer made the following remarks regarding the 2020 Special 301 Report:
“The Trump Administration is committed to holding intellectual property rights violators accountable and to ensuring that American innovators and creators have a full and fair opportunity to use and profit from their work. Over the last year, USTR has secured strong and enforceable obligations on intellectual property in our historic agreements with China, Canada, and Mexico.”
Comments Due January 28, 2021
USTR is seeking comments for its 2021 Special 301 review. USTR requests written comments that identify acts, policies, or practices that may form the basis of a country’s identification as a Priority Foreign Country or placement on the Priority Watch List or Watch List. Specifically, USTR requests that interested persons identify those countries whose acts, policies or practices deny adequate and effective protection for IP rights or deny fair and equitable market access to U.S. persons who rely on IP protection. According to USTR, written submissions from the public are a key source of information for the Special 301 review process.
The deadline for submitting written comments from the public is January 28, 2021. USTR will publish the 2021 Special 301 Report on or about April 30, 2021.
Contact Us
Diaz Trade Law has significant experience on intellectual property matters and in submitting comments on federal rulemaking. If you require assistance filing comments for the Special 301 review or have other questions pertaining to intellectual property, contact us today at info@diaztradelaw.com or 305-456-3830.