LinkedInFacebookInstagramXYouTube
305-456-3830|info@diaztradelaw.com

U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

Call 305-456-3830 or email info@diaztradelaw.com.

U.S. Government Continues to Signal Sanctions Enforcement as a Priority: Three Recent Cases  

The U.S. government continues to demonstrate its commitment to enforcing sanctions and export control laws, with three recent announcements from the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) highlighting the risks businesses and individuals face when compliance obligations are overlooked. 

Between October 9 and October 14, 2026, federal authorities announced a five-year prison sentence involving North Korean sanctions violations, a settlement with an international freight forwarding company, and an $11.6 million settlement with one of the nation’s largest banks. 

Although the cases involve different industries and circumstances, they reinforce a common message: sanctions enforcement extends across the global supply chain. 

DOJ: Five-Year Prison Sentence for North Korean Sanctions Violations 

On October 14, 2026, DOJ announced that Sasa Micev, a Bosnian national and international arms dealer, was sentenced to 60 months in federal prison after pleading guilty to violations of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and North Korean Sanctions Regulations. 

According to DOJ, Micev conspired with others to broker the purchase of North Korean SA-18 Igla portable surface-to-air missiles without the required authorization from OFAC. The scheme involved discussions about pricing, efforts to obtain the weapons using falsified documentation, and a meeting in Turkey to complete the transaction. The proposed sale ultimately fell through following a pricing dispute. 

OFAC: Freight Forwarder Agrees to $175,015 Settlement 

On October 9, 2026, OFAC announced a $175,015 settlement […]

By |2026-10-15T17:10:37-04:00October 15, 2026|U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)|0 Comments
Read More

Getting Off the SDN List: A Practical Guide to OFAC’s Administrative Reconsideration Process 

Landing on the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s (OFAC) Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) is one of the most consequential things that can happen to a company or individual doing business in or with the United States. Assets are frozen, U.S. persons are barred from dealing with you, and banking relationships evaporate almost overnight.  

The good news is that SDN designations are not necessarily permanent. OFAC maintains a formal process – administrative reconsideration – for petitioning to have a person, entity, or piece of property removed from an OFAC-administered sanctions list. This article walks through how that process works, what to expect at each stage, and where clients most often stumble. 

Step One: Confirm You’re Using the Right Process 

Before filing anything, it’s worth pausing to confirm which removal process actually applies to your situation, because OFAC’s administrative reconsideration process is not a one-size-fits-all remedy. 

  • You are the designated party. If you, your organization, or your property appear on an OFAC-administered list because OFAC itself made the designation, the administrative reconsideration process under 31 C.F.R. § 501.807 is the correct path, and it runs through OFAC’s Reconsideration Portal. 
  • The designation was made by the State Department. Some names appear on OFAC-administered lists because the Department of State designated them (for example, under certain terrorism-related authorities). Removal in those cases goes through […]
By |2026-08-27T16:16:18-04:00August 27, 2026|Export, U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)|0 Comments
Read More

New OFAC Advisory: Signs of Sham Transactions and Sanctions Evasion

On March 31, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) released an important advisory addressing the growing use of sham transactions to evade U.S. sanctions. The guidance highlights how sanctioned individuals and entities often attempt to disguise their continuing interest in property through opaque legal structures, proxies, and other intermediaries. OFAC’s message is clear: transactions that merely appear to transfer ownership but do not genuinely extinguish a blocked person’s interest remain prohibited. 

What OFAC Defines as a “Sham Transaction” 

Sham transactions occur when blocked persons “give up their property on paper only,” while continuing to benefit from or control the asset. These arrangements often involve: 

  • Proxies, straw owners, or front companies acting on behalf of sanctioned individuals. 
  • Opaque legal structures, including multi‑layered LLCs, partnerships, or trusts. 
  • Transfers to family members or close associates who may serve as facilitators. 
  • Commercially unreasonable transfers, such as those lacking adequate consideration. 
  • Continued use or control of the asset by the blocked person after the purported transfer. 

Pro Tip: Look beyond legal formalities and identify the economic realities of the transaction. 

Red Flags Identified by OFAC 

The advisory outlines several indicators that a transaction may be a sham designed to evade sanctions. These include: 

By |2026-04-07T16:53:01-04:00April 3, 2026|Enforcement, International Law, International Trade, Investigation, U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)|0 Comments
Read More

FinCEN Issues NPRM to Fully Implement Whistleblower Program

Authors:

Jennifer Diaz, President, Diaz Trade Law

Amber Pirson, Attorney, Diaz Trade Law

FinCEN’s March 30, 2026, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) marks a major step toward fully operationalizing the agency’s whistleblower program, designed to incentivize reporting of Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), sanctions, IEEPA, and other illicit finance violations. The proposal outlines how whistleblowers can securely submit information, how awards will be determined, and what protections will be available.  

This development reflects the Treasury Department’s broader strategy to strengthen financial system integrity and encourage actionable tips that support enforcement efforts. For financial institutions, compliance professionals, and potential whistleblowers, the NPRM provides long‑awaited clarity on program structure and expectations. 

Overview of the Proposed Rule 

FinCEN’s NPRM proposes a comprehensive framework for administering whistleblower submissions and awards. Key elements include: 

  • Secure submission procedures for individuals reporting suspected violations of the BSA, OFAC sanctions, and related laws. 
  • Eligibility criteria for whistleblower awards, including documentation requirements and timelines. 
  • Award ranges of 10–30% of monetary penalties collected when a whistleblower’s information leads to a successful enforcement action. 
  • Robust protections for individuals who provide information, including confidentiality and anti‑retaliation safeguards. 

These provisions aim to encourage early, detailed reporting while ensuring whistleblowers are shielded from adverse consequences. 

Why FinCEN Is Prioritizing Whistleblower Incentives 

The NPRM aligns with Treasury’s broader […]

By |2026-04-03T10:52:12-04:00April 3, 2026|Enforcement, International Law, Trade Policy, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)|0 Comments
Read More

ICYMI: Tri-Seal Advisory: Sanctions and Export Controls Relief for Syria

On November 7, 2025, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), alongside the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Commerce, issued a Tri-Seal Advisory: Sanctions and Export Controls Relief for Syria. 

The Advisory follows President Trump’s Executive Order on June 30, 2025, formally removing U.S. sanctions on Syria and directing agencies to take additional measures to encourage U.S. private sector and foreign partner reengagement in Syria.

New Opportunities & Remaining Restrictions

The Advisory outlines what business with Syria is now permissible as well as what restrictions remain.

Permissible Business:

  • The United States no longer imposes comprehensive sanctions on Syria. 
  • The Caesar Act is suspended, except for sanctionable transactions with Russia and Iran.
  • The transfer of most basic civilian use U.S.-origin goods, as well as software and technology, to or within Syria is permitted without a license. 

Remaining Restrictions:

  • Sanctions remain on “the worst of the worst:” Bashar al-Assad and his associates, human rights abusers, drug traffickers, and other destabilizing regional actors.
  • The U.S. Government continues to review Syria’s State Sponsor of Terrorism (SST) designation. 
  • Most Commerce Control List items going to Syria still require a U.S. export license.

What Exporters Should Do

The removal of Syria sanctions and the easing of […]

By |2025-11-24T11:18:20-05:00November 24, 2025|Export, International Trade, U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC), U.S. Department of State (DOS), U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)|0 Comments
Read More
This website uses cookies and third party services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the Privacy Policy. OK
Skip to content
Go to Top