Supply Chain Archives - Customs & International Trade Law Firm

Forced Labor Enforcement Just Crossed a Border: What CBP’s Serbia Copper WRO Means for Your Supply Chain
Gallery
Forced Labor Enforcement Just Crossed a Border: What CBP’s Serbia Copper WRO Means for Your Supply Chain
Enforcement, Forced Labor, Supply Chain, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

Forced Labor Enforcement Just Crossed a Border: What CBP’s Serbia Copper WRO Means for Your Supply Chain

Key Takeaways

CBP continues to chase the company, not just the country. Zijin’s parent was already on the UFLPA Entity List for forced labor in China; this Withhold Release Order (WRO) hits its Serbian copper operation on a separate evidentiary basis. Moving production to a “friendly” country does not move you out of CBP’s reach.
Copper just joined the enforcement map. Forced-labor detentions are no longer concentrated in apparel, solar, and cotton. If you import copper—or anything containing it—your supply chain is now in scope, and most copper-reliant importers have done zero forced-labor due diligence.
The burden is on you, and it lands the moment your shipment is detained. Under a WRO, there is no notice and no grace period. You either prove your goods are clean by detailed documentary evidence, or you export or destroy them.

On June 16, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued a Withhold Release Order against copper and copper products manufactured in Serbia by Serbia Zijin Copper D.O.O.—the fourth WRO of Fiscal Year 2026 and the second targeting a Serbian operation in roughly six months. Effective immediately, CBP personnel at every U.S. port of entry will detain shipments of copper and copper products from this company.

If you read that as another distant enforcement headline, you are missing the part that should concern you. This […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-06-19T13:16:32-04:00June 19, 2026|Enforcement, Forced Labor, Supply Chain, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|0 Comments

Trade-Based Money Laundering Red Flags: What CBP’s New CTPAT AML Guidance Means for Importers
Gallery
Trade-Based Money Laundering Red Flags: What CBP’s New CTPAT AML Guidance Means for Importers
Enforcement, Import, International Trade, Supply Chain

Trade-Based Money Laundering Red Flags: What CBP’s New CTPAT AML Guidance Means for Importers

As global supply chains grow more complex, regulators are increasingly focused on how legitimate trade can be exploited to move illicit funds. In July 2025, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) reinforced this focus by issuing updated CTPAT Warning Indicators for Trade‑Based Money Laundering (TBML) and Terrorist Financing.

Although the target audience for this guidance is CTPAT participants, all importers, logistics providers, and financial institutions can be implicated in TBML schemes if they don’t proactively screen for such activity in their supply chains. The Department of the Treasury released its 2026 National Money Laundering Assessment, which further highlights how TBML schemes are used to facilitate the transfer of illicit proceeds. Any business engaged in international trade that is unaware of how TBML works or fails to screen for such practices is exposed to engaging in TBML.

CBP’s message is simple: trade compliance and anti‑money laundering (AML) expectations are converging, and companies that fail to adapt face growing regulatory, operational, and reputational risk. CBP also emphasizes that TBML rarely presents as a single red flag; instead, it emerges through patterns that deserve closer scrutiny and informed judgment.

Warning Indicators

One of the most significant risk areas identified by CBP involves pricing and payment anomalies that defy commercial logic. Persistent over‑ or under‑invoicing, unexplained invoice changes, or pricing that is misaligned with market norms may indicate that a trade […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-04-13T09:02:09-04:00April 13, 2026|Enforcement, Import, International Trade, Supply Chain|0 Comments

De Minimis No More: What it Means for Importers and Consumers
Gallery
De Minimis No More: What it Means for Importers and Consumers
ACE, Enforcement, Import, International Trade, Supply Chain, tariffs, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

De Minimis No More: What it Means for Importers and Consumers

President Trump’s Executive Order suspending duty-free de minimis treatment of shipments entering the U.S. took effect last week. The de minimis exemption has been used by retailers around the world catering to the American shopper, and the end of the policy is causing a ripple effect around the globe.

What is De Minimis?

De minimis is a Latin term that means “of the smallest things,” “trifling,” “insignificant.” In the U.S., the de minimis rule dates back to the Tariff Act of 1930. Upon passage of the act, individuals and businesses were permitted to import shipments under $200 without paying duties and taxes.

The intent behind the exemption was to allow CBP to focus on higher-risk and higher-revenue imports and to encourage small-scale trade. In 2016, the U.S. raised the de minimis threshold to $800 with the passage of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act.

After the 2016 change, de minimis shipments surged, from 139 million in FY 2015 to 1.36 billion in FY 2024. International retailers took advantage of the new threshold, and many U.S. policymakers began referring to de minimis as a “loophole.”

Citing safety and fairness concerns, there were dozens of unsuccessful efforts in the U.S. Congress to end de minimis. Finally, the Big Beautiful Bill of 2025

By Jennifer Diaz|2025-09-15T11:19:26-04:00September 15, 2025|ACE, Enforcement, Import, International Trade, Supply Chain, tariffs, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|0 Comments

DHS Adds Additional UFLPA High-Priority Sectors; Releases UFLPA 2025 Strategy Update
Gallery
DHS Adds Additional UFLPA High-Priority Sectors; Releases UFLPA 2025 Strategy Update
Enforcement, Forced Labor, Import, International Trade, Supply Chain, U.S Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

DHS Adds Additional UFLPA High-Priority Sectors; Releases UFLPA 2025 Strategy Update

Learn more about this update and all things UFLPA at our upcoming forced labor webinar on Sept. 17, 2025. Register here.

On August 19, 2024, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that it would be adding steel, copper, lithium, caustic soda, and red dates to the list of high-priority sectors for enforcement under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA). DHS also announced the release of an update to the UFLPA enforcement strategy.

Addition of High-Priority Sectors

Under the UFLPA, DHS is tasked with identifying high-priority sectors for enforcement. A high-priority sector designation indicates that entities in the sector have a higher risk of forced labor or state labor transfer of Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities from Xinjiang.

In making the announcement of additional sectors, DHS cited each new addition’s connections to forced labor risks. For example, DHS stated that steel and copper have both been government-backed investment focal points in Xinjiang. Similarly, lithium is a government-identified key sector for investment and development in Xinjiang.

UFLPA Enforcement Strategy Update

DHS serves as the chair of the Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force (FLETF). Each year, the task force updates the UFLPA’s Strategy to Prevent the Importation of Goods Mined, Produced, or Manufactured with Forced Labor in the People’s Republic of China (UFLPA Strategy). The task force is statutorily required to provide annual updates […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2025-08-22T11:15:23-04:00August 22, 2025|Enforcement, Forced Labor, Import, International Trade, Supply Chain, U.S Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|0 Comments

Jennifer Diaz Featured in Inside U.S. Trade
Gallery
Jennifer Diaz Featured in Inside U.S. Trade
Import, news, Supply Chain

Jennifer Diaz Featured in Inside U.S. Trade

We are pleased to announce that DTL President Jennifer Diaz was recently featured in Inside U.S. Trade!

In the article, “New Transshipment Limits Could Bring Confusion, Enforcement Hurdles,” reporter Brett Fortnam walks through how the Administration’s new approach to combatting transshipment includes goods with significant content from third countries in addition to traditional transshipment. He quoted Jennifer on how this approach is likely to cause confusion up and down the supply chain.

Below are a few snippets from the piece. Read the full article on InsideTrade.com here.

“Diaz said a new approach to transshipment will sow confusion up and down the supply chain. Changing what confers a product’s country of origin ‘adds another pillar of complexity’ to already complicated rules of origin, Diaz said.”

“If I were CBP, I would have a hard time understanding what kind of documentation and proof will be necessary,” Diaz said of the new policy. “Are we going to have the ability to audit raw material for every item? We all need a framework to start with. Now we’re all subject to audit risk, penalties and criminality. We need a good framework to ensure that everyone has the ability to comply.”

Diaz Trade Law is tracking the latest updates to U.S. trade policy.

Learn more:

By Jennifer Diaz|2025-08-05T13:34:46-04:00August 5, 2025|Import, news, Supply Chain|0 Comments

12 Next