U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Archives - Page 2 of 98

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Will Order Reliquidation of Some Finally Liquidated Entries
Gallery
IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Will Order Reliquidation of Some Finally Liquidated Entries
Import, International Trade, tariffs, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Will Order Reliquidation of Some Finally Liquidated Entries

Short summary: The U.S. Court of International Trade has announced that it plans to order U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to reliquidate certain finally liquidated entries in approximately 3,700 pending IEEPA tariff refund cases once CAPE Phase 3 launches. The court also confirmed that CBP continues to expand CAPE’s refund capabilities, including future functionality for entries with open protests, and provided an update on the billions of dollars in refunds already being processed. These developments represent another significant step toward resolving pending IEEPA tariff refund claims for importers.

The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) has announced another significant development in the ongoing litigation over tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). In a July 15, 2026, order, Judge Richard K. Eaton confirmed that the court intends to direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to reliquidate certain finally liquidated entries in the approximately 3,700 pending CIT IEEPA refund cases once the next phase of CBP’s Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) refund system becomes operational.

While the order does not immediately authorize refunds of liquidated entries, it provides important insight into how the court and CBP plan to move thousands of pending refund claims toward resolution.

Reliquidation Order Planned for Thousands of Cases

The court stated that, in connection with the anticipated launch of CAPE Phase 3, it will issue an order directing CBP to reliquidate certain finally liquidated entries […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-07-16T14:00:35-04:00July 16, 2026|Import, International Trade, tariffs, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|0 Comments

Understanding HTSUS Classification: Why Getting It Wrong Is Expensive
Gallery
Understanding HTSUS Classification: Why Getting It Wrong Is Expensive
Import, Reasonable Care, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

Understanding HTSUS Classification: Why Getting It Wrong Is Expensive

Summary: HTSUS classification determines the duty rate, applicability of tariffs such as Section 301 and Section 232, trade program eligibility, and helps determine whether any AD/CVD duties apply to every imported product. Misclassification often goes undetected for months or years, and since importers tend to reuse the same code for every entry of the same product, a single error can compound into significant back duties, penalties, and prior disclosure obligations. This article breaks down how classification errors happen, what reasonable care looks like, and how a documented classification process can prevent a small mistake from becoming a costly one.

Every product entering the United States must be assigned a classification code under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), and that ten-digit number determines far more than most importers realize. It sets the duty rate and tariffs owed on a shipment, flags whether a product needs additional agency review, and establishes whether it qualifies for preferential trade programs. A misclassification, even an unintentional one, can trigger back duties, penalties, and a prior disclosure process that could have been avoided entirely with the right classification from the start.

What HTSUS Classification Actually Determines

The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is the United States’ implementation of the international Harmonized System, a standardized numerical method of classifying traded products used by customs authorities around the world. Every entry filed with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) requires an HTSUS code, and […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-07-10T11:00:22-04:00July 10, 2026|Import, Reasonable Care, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|0 Comments

Mandatory CPSC eFiling is Here
Gallery
Mandatory CPSC eFiling is Here
ACE, Import, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)

Mandatory CPSC eFiling is Here

Key Takeaways

Starting July 8, 2026, importers of most regulated consumer products must electronically file (eFile) Certificate of Compliance data into CBP’s ACE system at the time of entry, no longer on request.
At launch, CPSC does not intend to have ACE reject entries or deny admission solely for failure to eFile, only warning messages. But CPSC will still enforce certificate requirements, seek seizure of non-compliant goods, and adjust your risk score.
A testing exemption or determination does not eliminate the certificate. You must still issue a certificate citing the rule and naming the exemption. This is a trap that catches importers who assume “exempt” means “nothing to file.”
Products entering a Foreign Trade Zone and later withdrawn for consumption or warehousing get a later effective date: January 8, 2027.
The eFiling rule changes how certificate data is filed, not which products need a certificate. Certification has been required since 2008.

A Compliance Shift Disguised as a Filing Update

Since 2008, importers and domestic manufacturers of CPSC-regulated consumer products have been required to maintain a Certificate of Compliance: a Children’s Product Certificate (CPC) for children’s products, or a General Certificate of Conformity (GCC) for regulated general-use products, and produce it on request. Under […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-07-08T10:11:26-04:00July 8, 2026|ACE, Import, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)|0 Comments

CBP CAPE Phase 2 Update: 4.36 Million Entries Fail, Finally-Liquidated Importers Left Out
Gallery
CBP CAPE Phase 2 Update: 4.36 Million Entries Fail, Finally-Liquidated Importers Left Out
ACE, Import, tariffs, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

CBP CAPE Phase 2 Update: 4.36 Million Entries Fail, Finally-Liquidated Importers Left Out

KEY TAKEAWAYS

CBP has certified roughly $71.06 billion in IEEPA refunds and cleared 18.1 million entries through CAPE — but the headline number hides who is being left out.
4.36 million entries failed CAPE’s entry-level checks. If your entry is finally liquidated beyond CBP’s 90-day reliquidation window, CAPE will not refund it, and the government is fighting to keep it that way on appeal.
Phase 2 (reconciliation-flagged entries) went live June 29, 2026. Finally, liquidated entries remain in dispute at the Federal Circuit (No. 26-1898).
The government’s stated position: no refund on finally-liquidated entries unless the importer filed suit at the CIT. Filing preserves your standing while the appeal plays out; it is not a guarantee of recovery.
Three fixable failure reasons: importer/filer mismatch, entry-number errors, and CSV template misalignment are costing importers refunds they are otherwise entitled to.

A $71 Billion Headline That Hides Who Isn’t Getting Paid

On July 1, 2026, CBP filed its latest status declaration in Euro-Notions Florida, Inc. v. United States (CIT No. 25-00595) — the lead case now governing how IEEPA duty refunds are administered through CBP’s Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) platform. The numbers are large. As of June 29, 2026, CBP reported that CAPE declarations had cleared file validation covering 18.1 million entries, that 15.92 […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-07-03T12:33:45-04:00July 3, 2026|ACE, Import, tariffs, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|0 Comments

The U.S. Declined to Renew USMCA – What Importers Must Do Now
Gallery
The U.S. Declined to Renew USMCA – What Importers Must Do Now
Import, Trade Policy, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), USMCA

The U.S. Declined to Renew USMCA – What Importers Must Do Now

USMCA remains in force, but annual reviews create a new layer of origin compliance risk that importers can’t afford to ignore.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

USMCA did not end. On July 1, 2026, the U.S. declined to renew the agreement for a fresh 16-year term, moving it into annual reviews. The pact stays in force, potentially through 2036, unless a country formally exits with six months’ notice.
Nothing changes at the port tomorrow. USMCA-qualifying goods still enter duty-free. Your certifications, rules-of-origin claims, and preference elections remain valid today.
The real risk is enforcement, not policy. A decade of open renegotiation puts rules of origin, especially auto content and regional-value-content thresholds, into permanent play. Origin claims made under old assumptions become audit and penalty exposure.
Act now on documentation, not headlines. Importers should stress-test USMCA certifications, tighten origin recordkeeping, and model exposure to Section 232 auto/steel/aluminum tariffs that already sit on top of the agreement.

The Challenge: Compliance & Enforcement

The news landed fast and loud: the United States declined to renew the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) on July 1, 2026. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer confirmed the U.S. would forgo a fresh 16-year term in favor of annual reviews of the pact. Some coverage framed this as the end of North American free trade. It is not.

Here is the […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-07-02T07:30:25-04:00July 2, 2026|Import, Trade Policy, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), USMCA|0 Comments

Previous 123 Next