Gluten Free Labeling is Coming – But, First, FDA Wants to Hear From YOU!!!!

Imagine a world where a manufacturer’s claims that their products are “gluten free” could be trusted by U.S. consumers.  Imagine a world where U.S. consumers were promised a definition of “gluten free” by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the FDA held all manufacturers and importers to the same stringent standard….
Good news, we’re getting close!!
As of August 2, 2011, FDA has re-opened the comment period so that they can hear from YOU.  Yes, YOU!  FDA wants to hear from Celiacs, gluten sensitive consumers, et al. in the U.S.  Why, you ask?  Well, the FDA is firming up their definition of “gluten free”; and wants to know that the gluten free community is satisfied with the FDA’s finalized definition.  So, let’s make sure we tell the FDA what’s important to us.  FDA has proposed a definition of “gluten free” in order for the term to be used on labeling of food products.
FDA’s proposed rule defines “gluten free” as products that do not contain:

FDA’s Update on its Regulation of Cosmetic Products

On July 14, 2011, FDA posted an update on how it regulates cosmetic products.  The full update is below for your perusal. In my practice, I have seen warning letters from the FDA, refusals and the insertion of companies on FDA’s Import Alert List (goods are automatically detained when entering the U.S., and it is up to the importer to prove to the FDA that the products are in compliance for EACH importation).  It will be interesting to see if the FDA ramps up enforcement for violative cosmetics.  Interesting to note is FDA’s newer Import Alert (IA) for cosmetic products – IA  66-38, “Skin Care Products Labeled As Anti-Aging Creams,” dated April 8, 2011.  Getting off the Import Alert list is a rather rigorous process, which will be the subject of another post.  Interested to note if you see ramped up enforcement of cosmetics with the new administration?

How FDA Evaluates Regulated Products

 

The Food and Drug Administration’s Strategic Action Plan for Risk Communication is an initiative to tell consumers how the agency makes decisions on the safety and effectiveness of FDA-regulated products. This is the first in a series of articles about the data and methods—and their limitations—that FDA uses to determine whether products are safe for consumers to use.

 

Here’s a look at how FDA’s Office of Cosmetics and Colors evaluates the safety of cosmetics.

The Regulation of Cosmetics:

Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, cosmetic products and ingredients do […]

Changes in FDA’s Management Structure – Message from the Commissioner to FDA Staff

Dear Colleagues,

I am writing today to let you know about some changes that I will be making to the agency’s management structure. As you probably recall, back in January, I told you that I was initiating a review of the Office of the Commissioner. As I explained at that time, this review was driven by the expanding and rapidly changing nature of the Agency’s responsibilities, and the need for a management structure that reflects these changes and best supports your efforts.

I consulted with former Commissioners, as well as with HHS Secretary Sebelius, and considered many options before arriving at the structure that I am announcing today.

The most important thing driving my consideration of this is the changing nature of both the Agency and the job of Commissioner.

Today, the Agency faces several key challenges:

First, we are a very large agency, with an incredibly broad span of responsibility. We regulate products that account for between 20 and 25 percent of every consumer dollar spent in the U.S. and that total more than a trillion dollars annually. For the most part, these are products that people rely on in fundamental ways every day.

Second, as technology and science continue to evolve, we are faced with the challenge of making sure that new ideas translate into the products and opportunities that people need and count on to protect their health. Innovative products that are truly transformative create unique scientific and regulatory challenges, and […]

The Journal for Export Control Professionals

I am pleased to introduce to you a new periodical, “World Export Controls Review – the journal of export controls and compliance,” published by Brightlaw Media Ltd., London, England.  The first issue published in March 2011 is free.  The April 2011 publication contains my article entitled “Good Practice: Responding to an OFAC Administrative Subpoena” (available only upon request).

The publication reports on sanctions programs such as the United States has with Burma, Iran, and Libya, as well as general international trade topics such as “U.S. Tightens Controls on Foreign Workers” or “Evolving Intent Standards in U.S. Prosecutions”. The publication is truly for the legal experts in international trade and export controls.

world ecr helps its readers stay on top of:

  • Developments in export control regulation and policy around the world,
  • Changing enforcement policies and practice governing export and re-export,
  • Legal implications of changing distribution technologies,
  • Best practice in trade regulation compliance, and
  •  
  • Encryption, technology transfer and end-use and end-user controls.

I hope you enjoy reading the article, and will subscribe to the publication. 

New Export Enforcement Priorities Come with New Names at the Bureau of Industry and Security

On April 14, 2011, in Washington, D.C., David Mills, the new Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), U.S. Department of Commerce, and his Special Advisor, Bob Rarog, explained the enforcement priorities of BIS. These priorities were established by Eric Hirschhorn, who was just sworn in as Under Secretary of the U.S. Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) on April 2, 2010, after being appointed by President Obama. This event was part of the American Bar Association’s Section of International Law’s Export Controls and Economic Sanctions Committee.

David Mills, who has an excellent perspective from recently being a private practicing attorney, and was formerly the Chief of Licensing at the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), identified the three primary initiatives of export enforcement by the BIS.

1.  Efficiency – process administrative cases faster.

2.  Education – outreach program to exporting companies.

3.  Enforcement – going for the $250,000 maximum penalty or twice the value of the transaction, whichever is greater.

David Mills stated that where both OFAC and BIS have jurisdiction over a violation, it is best to file voluntary self disclosure simultaneously with both agencies.  Generally, Special Agents from the BIS’ Office of Export Enforcement will conduct the investigation thereafter.  Another interesting point was that the Obama Administration remains focused on Iran, preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and prohibiting any transactions with Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs). This is consistent with the U.S. Department of Justice’s recent National Counter-Proliferation Initiative to increase the […]

By |2015-12-01T02:00:06-05:00April 17, 2011|Export|0 Comments
Go to Top