New AD/CVD Case Filed Against Silicon Photovoltaic Cells from India, Indonesia, and Laos

A new antidumping and countervailing duty action has been filed against Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, whether or not assembled into modules, imported from the Republic of India, the Republic of Indonesia, and the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. The allegation is that imports from India, Indonesia, and Laos are unfairly subsidized and being dumped.  

Full list of exporters here. 

Full list of importers here.  

Background on AD/CVD Investigations 

Antidumping duty (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigations are brought jointly by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC”) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). AD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports of particular goods from specific countries being sold at less than a fair value. Meanwhile, CVD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports that are being unfairly subsidized by their governments. The domestic industry initiating the investigation is known as the petitioner while the foreign industry participating in the investigation is known as the respondent. 

Scope of the Investigation 

The merchandise covered by these investigations is crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, modules, laminates, panels, and building integrated materials.  

The products subject to the investigations are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 8501.61.0000, 8507.20.80, 8541.42.0010, and 8541.43.0010. Full scope here.

AD/CVD News: New Case Filed Against Oleoresin Paprika from India

A new antidumping and countervailing duty action has been filed against Oleoresin Paprika imported from India. The allegation is that imports from India are unfairly subsidized and being dumped.  

Full list of exporters here. 

Full list of importers here.  

Background on AD/CVD Investigations 

Antidumping duty (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigations are brought jointly by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC”) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). AD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports of particular goods from specific countries being sold at less than a fair value. Meanwhile, CVD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports that are being unfairly subsidized by their governments. The domestic industry initiating the investigation is known as the petitioner while the foreign industry participating in the investigation is known as the respondent. 

Scope of the Investigation 

The merchandise covered by these investigations is coloring additive oleoresin paprika.  

 The products subject to the investigations are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 3203.00.8000 and 3301.90.1010. Subject merchandise may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 1301.90.9190, 1302.19.9140, and 3205.00.0500. 

New AD/CVD Case Filed Against Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam

A new antidumping and countervailing duty action has been filed against Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar imported from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam. The subject merchandise covered by this petition is steel concrete reinforcing bar, which is widely used for nonresidential and infrastructure construction. The allegation is that imports from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam are both unfairly subsidized and are being dumped (sold below cost).  

Importers:

  • ArcelorMittal
  • Ag Royce Metal Marketing Dba Concrete Reinforcing Products
  • Duferco Steel LLC
  • Intermetal Rebar LLC
  • Macsteel International USA Corp.
  • Stamford Metal Group

Exporters:

Bulgaria

  • Helios-Metalurg
  • Hus Ltd
  • Intercom Group
  • Promet Steel
  • SIDMA
  • Stad
  • Stomana Industry

Egypt

  • Al-Gioshy Steel
  • Al Madina Steel
  • Delta Steel Mill Co.
  • Egyptian Company for Iron and Steel
  • Egyptian Iron and Steel & Co.
  • Egyptian Steel
  • El-Ashry Steel
  • Elmarakby Steel
  • Ezz Steel
  • Misr National Steel
  • National Port Said Steel Co.
  • Suez Steel
  • Etaqa, Adabya St., Suez

Algeria

  • Algerian Qatari Steel
  • Metal Steel Company LTS SETIF
  • The National Long Products Processing Company (ENTPL)
  • Tosyalı Algérie

Vietnam

  • Formosa Ha Tinh Steel Corporation
  • Hoa Phat Group
  • Hoa Sen Group
  • Mien Hua Precision Mechanical Co., Ltd.

New AD/CVD Case Filed Against L-lysine from the People’s Republic of China

A new antidumping and countervailing duty action has been filed against “L-lysine” imported from China. The L-lysine covered by this petition is animal feed grade L-lysine. The allegation is that imports from China are both unfairly subsidized and are being dumped (sold below cost).   

Full list of exporters here. 

Full list of importers here.  

Background on AD/CVD Investigations 

Antidumping duty (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigations are brought jointly by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC”) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). AD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports of particular goods from specific countries being sold at less than a fair value. Meanwhile, CVD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports that are being unfairly subsidized by their governments. The domestic industry initiating the investigation is known as the petitioner while the foreign industry participating in the investigation is known as the respondent. 

Scope of the Investigation 

The merchandise covered by these investigations is animal feed grade L-lysine. Lysine is an essential amino acid added to animal feed that is used in biosynthesis of proteins. 

The products subject to the investigations are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under statistical reporting number 2922.41.0090. 

Full scope here. 

U.S. Imports of Subject […]

AD/CVD News: Initiation of AD/CVD Investigations on Silicon Metal from Angola, Australia, Laos, Norway, and Thailand 

On April 24, 2025, Ferroglobe USA, Inc. and Mississippi Silicon LLC (collectively, “Petitioners”) filed an antidumping and countervailing duties petition on ferrosilicon from Angola, Australia, Laos, Norway, and Thailand.

Background on AD/CVD Investigations

Antidumping duty (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigations are brought jointly by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC”) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). AD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports of particular goods from specific countries being sold at less than a fair value. Meanwhile, CVD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports that are being unfairly subsidized by their governments. The domestic industry initiating the investigation is known as the petitioner while the foreign industry participating in the investigation is known as the respondent.

Scope of the Investigation

The merchandise covered is all forms and sizes of silicon metal, including silicon metal powder. Silicon metal contains at least 85.00 percent but less than 99.99 percent silicon, and less than 4.00 percent iron, by actual weight. Semiconductor grade silicon (merchandise containing at least 99.99 percent silicon by actual weight and classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 2804.61.0000) is excluded from the scope of this investigation.  

Silicon metal is currently classifiable under subheadings 2804.69.1000 and 2804.69.5000 of the HTSUS. While the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope remains dispositive. 

Next Steps

On May 21, 2025, the U.S. Department […]

Go to Top