LinkedInFacebookInstagramXYouTube
305-456-3830|info@diaztradelaw.com

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

Call 305-456-3830 or email info@diaztradelaw.com.

Avoid Penalties, Build Confidence: Importers Thrive in CBP’s Recordkeeping Compliance Program

Authors: 
Jennifer Diaz, President, Diaz Trade Law
Amber Pirson, Attorney, Diaz Trade Law

What Is the Recordkeeping Compliance Program?

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) requires importers to maintain and produce specific records related to their entries. Under 19 C.F.R. § 163.12, CBP offers a Recordkeeping Compliance Program—a voluntary and free certification program designed to help importers strengthen their internal controls, improve record management, and demonstrate a proactive commitment to compliance. 

At its core, the program allows importers to work collaboratively with CBP to ensure they understand their obligations under the Customs Modernization Act (Mod Act) and are equipped to meet them. Certification signals that an importer has established reliable procedures for maintaining, retrieving, and producing required entry records. 

What Are the Benefits of the Program?

Participating in the Recordkeeping Compliance Program offers several meaningful advantages:  

  • Reduced Exposure to Penalties 

Certified importers may receive mitigation benefits if they inadvertently fail to produce certain records. CBP recognizes that certified companies have invested in compliance infrastructure and may treat isolated lapses more leniently. 

  • Stronger Relationship With CBP 

Certification demonstrates good faith and transparency. Importers who demonstrate that they take compliance seriously often experience smoother interactions with CBP, including during audits, inquiries, and enforcement actions. 

  • Improved Internal Controls 

The certification process requires importers to evaluate and […]

By |2026-03-18T12:11:17-04:00March 18, 2026|U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|0 Comments
Read More

Section 301 Investigation into Forced Labor Practices — US Allies and FTA Partners Under Scrutiny

On March 12, 2026, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) published its Initiation of Section 301 Investigations into the practices of various economies, including that of US allies and long-standing trade partners, for their alleged failure to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor.  

What Can the USTR Do? 

Section 301, formally known as Title III of the Trade Act of 1974 or “Relief from Unfair Trade Practices,” authorizes the USTR to investigate acts, policies, or practices that it considers unreasonable, discriminatory, or burdensome to US commerce. The USTR goes on to say that practices which permit forced or compulsory labor meet the criteria of unreasonable, unfair, and inequitable. If the USTR concludes that an act is “unjustifiable” and “burdens or restricts” US commerce, action is mandatory. On the other hand, if the USTR determines that such act is only “unreasonable or discriminatory” and “burdens or restricts” US commerce, action is discretionary. In either case, when the USTR aims to remedy a foreign trade practice, the agency can (1) impose tariffs or other import restrictions, (2) withdraw or suspend trade agreement concessions, or (3) enter into a binding agreement with the foreign government to either cease the conduct in question or compensate the US. Additionally, the statute requires that when USTR’s action is mandatory, the agency’s action should “affect goods or services of the foreign country in an amount that is equivalent in value to the burden or restriction […]

By |2026-03-16T08:20:41-04:00March 16, 2026|Forced Labor|0 Comments
Read More

Court Orders Refunds of IEEPA Tariffs – NOW Is the Time to File Litigation at the CIT

In a significant development for importers, on March 4, 2026, Judge Eaton of the Court of International Trade (CIT) issued a strong and detailed order requiring the refunds for entries of every plaintiff before the CIT who has challenged these IEEPA Tariffs.

The CIT Order

In the order, Judge Eaton clearly stated that the court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i), the CIT has national jurisdiction and the ability to issue a broad order, that he is the judge to whom all IEEPA refunds have been assigned, and that he views the facts and law as clear. It is not clear whether he is also ordering the refunds for everyone else not in court, which will unquestionably be further litigated. 

We note that in response to written questions from the court, U.S. Customs and Border Protection stated that they were continuing to liquidate entries with IEEPA duties if they were deposited at the time of entry, that they were not issuing refunds, and that they had not issued instructions to liquidate without IEEPA duties. They further stated that any refunds will require a review to determine if there was a violation of other customs laws or if other duties, taxes, and fees were still owed. In other words, CBP intends to conduct detailed reviews of all entries before issuing refunds. The responses provided by CBP to the Judge were reviewed by the Judge and likely resulted […]

By |2026-03-06T10:40:19-05:00March 6, 2026|Import, International Trade, tariffs, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC)|0 Comments
Read More

FDA Finalizes New National Drug Code Format

On March 5, 2026, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a Final Rule adopting a new format for the National Drug Code (NDC). The rule takes effect on March 7, 2033. On the effective date, the FDA will assign new 12-digit NDCs and convert all previously assigned 10-digit NDCs to the uniform 12-digit NDC format.

What is the NDC?

The NDC is an FDA standard for uniquely identifying drugs marketed in the U.S. Currently, the NDC assigned by the FDA for each listed drug marketed in the U.S. is a unique 10-digit number and can be in several different formats.

Current formats:

10-digit identifier

The FDA’s standard NDC is a 10-digit numerical identifier that includes a labeler code, product code, and package code.

There are 3 FDA-assigned formats for the standard NDC:

  • 4-4-2
  • 5-3-2
  • 5-4-1

HIPAA Format

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) adopted a uniform 11-digit NDC format that must be used when a HIPAA-covered transaction includes an NDC. This 11-digit format is standardized into a 5-4-2 format and created by adding a leading zero to either the labeler, product, or package code.

Upcoming 6-Digit Format

The FDA will run out of 5-digit labeler codes in 10-15 years. Per FDA regulations (21 CFR 207.33), once the FDA runs out of 5-digit labeler codes, it will start assigning 6-digit labeler codes. Without this proposed change, there would be five NDC formats, 3 in 10- […]

By |2026-03-05T10:07:14-05:00March 5, 2026|Enforcement, Food, Import, Medical Devices, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)|0 Comments
Read More

Supreme Court Rules IEEPA Tariffs Are Unlawful

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issued its opinion in Learning Resources, Inc., et al. v. Trump. The Court ruled that IEEPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs. 

The Court rejected the Trump Administration’s assertion that the statutory text of IEEPA delegates Congressional tariff powers to the President, finding that Congress would not have delegated “highly consequential power” through ambiguous language.

The majority wrote, “Based on two words separated by 16 others in … IEEPA, ‘regulate’ and ‘importation’–the President asserts the independent power to impose tariffs on imports from any country, of any product, at any rate, for any amount of time. Those words cannot bear such weight.”

The decision was 6-3, with Justice Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh dissenting.

What This Means for Importers

The Trump Administration has made clear that, regardless of the Supreme Court’s decision, tariffs will remain a cornerstone of their trade and “America First” policy. 

On January 9, 2026, National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said of the Supreme Court case: “Our expectation is that we’re going to win, and if we don’t win, then we know that we’ve got other tools that we can use that get us to the same place.” He also said in a Fox Business Interview that the Administration has a backup plan ready to go that would allow tariffs to be put “back into […]

By |2026-02-23T22:09:21-05:00February 23, 2026|International Trade, news, tariffs, Trade Policy, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|0 Comments
Read More
This website uses cookies and third party services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the Privacy Policy. OK
Skip to content
Go to Top