October 2026 - Page 2 of 5 - Customs & International Trade Law Firm

Postal De Minimis Rule Update: CBP Makes the January 20, 2027 Mail Entry Deadline Official and Eases PGA Data for Entry Type 13
Gallery
Postal De Minimis Rule Update: CBP Makes the January 20, 2027 Mail Entry Deadline Official and Eases PGA Data for Entry Type 13
ACE, Customs Broker, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

Postal De Minimis Rule Update: CBP Makes the January 20, 2027 Mail Entry Deadline Official and Eases PGA Data for Entry Type 13

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) published a final rule in the October 22, 2026 Federal Register that moves the compliance date for the postal rule’s formal entry requirements from October 22, 2026, to January 20, 2027. The same day, CBP modified its Entry Type 13 test so filers can submit an electronic mail entry before their Partner Government Agency (PGA) data is complete. Importers, e-commerce sellers, and licensed customs brokers handling mail shipments subject to PGA requirements, Chapter 98 or 99 duties, or Chapter 98 and free trade agreement claims now have a published date and a lower barrier to start filing Entry Type 13.

Key Takeaways

On October 22, 2026, CBP published a final rule setting January 20, 2027, as the compliance date for the postal formal entry provisions in 19 CFR 145.12(a)(2)(v) and (vi) (91 FR 66638).
The rule covers mail shipments subject to Partner Government Agency (PGA) requirements, subject to duties under HTSUS Chapter 98 or 99, or claiming duty-free treatment under Chapter 98 or a free trade agreement.
CBP stated that the extension does not change the process currently used for informal mail entries during the delay, and that parties may come into compliance earlier.
In a separate notice effective October […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-10-23T16:10:52-04:00October 23, 2026|ACE, Customs Broker, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|0 Comments

EAPA Enforcement Process
Gallery
EAPA Enforcement Process
Bloomberg Import

EAPA Enforcement Process

Jennifer Diaz was recently published in Bloomberg Law!

Reproduced with permission. Published October 2026. Copyright © 2026 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. EAPA Enforcement Process. For further use, please contact permissions@bloombergindustry.com.

Editor’s Note: The Enforce and Protect Act has become an important enforcement mechanism for US Customs and Border Protection in cases involving alleged evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty orders. Enacted in 2016 as part of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act, EAPA established a formal process for CBP to investigate allegations made by interested parties that covered merchandise entered the US through evasion of AD/CVD duties.

For importers, EAPA risk extends beyond an eventual determination that additional duties are owed. CBP can impose significant interim measures while an investigation remains pending, and an affirmative evasion determination can lead to additional civil or criminal enforcement. Understanding the EAPA process and addressing potential AD/CVD exposure before goods enter the US is an important part of import compliance.

By Jennifer Diaz, Diaz Trade Law

CBP Investigations

The Department of Commerce and CBP play distinct roles in administering US AD/CVD laws. Commerce determines the scope of AD/CVD orders and establishes applicable duty rates. CBP is responsible for collecting those duties and enforcing the orders at the border.

EAPA, codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1517, gives CBP specific authority to investigate allegations that importers have entered merchandise subject to […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-10-20T18:10:25-04:00October 20, 2026|Bloomberg Import|0 Comments

IEEPA Refund Class Certified: Why Importers With Significant Phase 3 Refunds Should Still File Their Own Suit
Gallery
IEEPA Refund Class Certified: Why Importers With Significant Phase 3 Refunds Should Still File Their Own Suit
tariffs, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

IEEPA Refund Class Certified: Why Importers With Significant Phase 3 Refunds Should Still File Their Own Suit

By Jennifer Diaz and David Craven | October 2026

On October 8, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade certified a nationwide class of importers of record that paid IEEPA duties and have not filed their own refund lawsuits, in Freestyle World, Inc. v. CBP, Ct. No. 26-01088. Certification does not issue refunds, and class members do not have access to CAPE Phase 3, which CBP opened on October 6 for finally liquidated entries of importers holding their own court orders. Importers with significant refunds on finally liquidated entries should weigh filing their own case now rather than waiting on the class.

Key Takeaways

On October 8, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) certified a class of importers of record that paid IEEPA duties between February 1, 2025, and February 19, 2026, excluding any entity that separately filed its own refund action.
Class certification is not a refund order. The CIT has not entered classwide relief, and further proceedings are pending.
CBP deployed CAPE Phase 3 on October 6, 2026, for finally liquidated entries of importers that filed suit and hold court orders directing reliquidation. Class members do not currently have Phase 3 access through the class.
As of October 19, 2026, the government had not appealed the class […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-10-29T09:56:53-04:00October 19, 2026|tariffs, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|0 Comments

Breaking Trade News: CBP Informal Entry Deadline Extended, 60 Month Prison Sentence for Export Violations
Gallery
Breaking Trade News: CBP Informal Entry Deadline Extended, 60 Month Prison Sentence for Export Violations
news, Snapshot

Breaking Trade News: CBP Informal Entry Deadline Extended, 60 Month Prison Sentence for Export Violations

This week’s recap of the latest customs and international trade news:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

CBP announced the extension of the compliance date for new informal entry procedures for international mail from Oct. 22, 2026, to Jan. 20, 2027.
CBP officers in Indianapolis intercepted a shipment containing 300 counterfeit Audemars Piguet watches. Had these items been genuine, the shipment would have had a combined manufacturer’s suggested retail price of $12 million.
CBP announced email or text message verification will be required for Automated Clearinghouse refund information changes made in ACE starting Oct. 10.

Department of Justice (DOJ)

DOJ announced that a Bosnian national was sentenced to 60 months in federal prison after pleading guilty to export and sanctions violations involving an attempted transaction for North Korean anti-aircraft missiles.

Federal Maritime Commission (FMC)

The FMC is proposing fees on all Spanish-flagged vessels after an investigation revealed the government of Spain created unfavorable shipping conditions for U.S.-flagged vessels.
The FMC published its latest Ocean Transportation Intermediary (OTI) license applicant update, identifying companies seeking new ocean freight forwarder and NVOCC licenses, […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-10-16T17:00:58-04:00October 16, 2026|news, Snapshot|0 Comments

U.S. Government Continues to Signal Sanctions Enforcement as a Priority: Three Recent Cases
Gallery
U.S. Government Continues to Signal Sanctions Enforcement as a Priority: Three Recent Cases
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

U.S. Government Continues to Signal Sanctions Enforcement as a Priority: Three Recent Cases

The U.S. government continues to demonstrate its commitment to enforcing sanctions and export control laws, with three recent announcements from the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) highlighting the risks businesses and individuals face when compliance obligations are overlooked.

Between October 9 and October 14, 2026, federal authorities announced a five-year prison sentence involving North Korean sanctions violations, a settlement with an international freight forwarding company, and an $11.6 million settlement with one of the nation’s largest banks.

Although the cases involve different industries and circumstances, they reinforce a common message: sanctions enforcement extends across the global supply chain.

DOJ: Five-Year Prison Sentence for North Korean Sanctions Violations

On October 14, 2026, DOJ announced that Sasa Micev, a Bosnian national and international arms dealer, was sentenced to 60 months in federal prison after pleading guilty to violations of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and North Korean Sanctions Regulations.

According to DOJ, Micev conspired with others to broker the purchase of North Korean SA-18 Igla portable surface-to-air missiles without the required authorization from OFAC. The scheme involved discussions about pricing, efforts to obtain the weapons using falsified documentation, and a meeting in Turkey to complete the transaction. The proposed sale ultimately fell through following a pricing dispute.

OFAC: Freight Forwarder Agrees to $175,015 Settlement

On October 9, 2026, OFAC announced a $175,015 settlement […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-10-15T17:10:37-04:00October 15, 2026|U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)|0 Comments

Previous 123 Next