fraud

DOJ Targets Trade Fraud: Importers Now on Notice as Criminal Division Ramps Up Enforcement

On May 12, 2025, Matthew Galeotti, the Head of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Criminal Division, sent a memo to all criminal division personnel highlighting the focus areas of the division for white-collar crime.

The memo included a list of “high-impact areas” that the division will prioritize investigating and prosecuting. Trade and customs fraud, including tariff evasion, was second on the list.

The DOJ also revised its Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program and added “trade, tariff, and customs fraud by corporations” to the priority list.

Galeotti noted that unchecked fraud in U.S. markets robs hardworking Americans, harms the public, and that efficient enforcement promotes American economic and national security interests.

This memo signals a significant shift in the priorities of the DOJ’s criminal division. Historically, trade violations were not a top criminal priority and were instead handled by CBP and the DOJ’s Civil Division. Relatively few trade law violation cases have risen to the level of criminal prosecution.

What Importers Should Do

Now more than ever it is critical for importers to examine their import compliance programs and ensure that adequate procedures are in place to correctly enter goods into the United States.

Invest in Compliance

CBP expects importers to use “reasonable care” in reporting HTS, value, country of origin, free trade agreement preference, etc. This is a subjective standard; however, CBP […]

By |2025-06-13T13:24:14-04:00June 13, 2025|U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)|0 Comments

Can A False Claims Act Qui Tam Case, Alleging Customs Fraud, Be Filed And Pursued Anonymously?

Co-authored by:
Jonathan Tycko – Tycko & Zavareei LLP
Jennifer Diaz – Diaz Trade Law

Introduction

A company you work for, or maybe a competing company, is committing customs fraud.  The company is lying about the value of the products it is importing, using improper HTS codes to avoid duties, or importing products that have been transshipped to evade tariffs.  What can you do about it?  One option is to file what is known as a “qui tam” lawsuit under the federal False Claims Act.  A qui tam lawsuit is one that is brought by a private citizen or company against defendant that owe money to the government.  When a qui tam lawsuit is successful, the party that initiated the case—called a “relator”—is entitled to a substantial monetary reward, ranging between 15% and 30% of the amount recovered for the government.  A qui tam lawsuit has another major advantage: it engages the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) in the case, and typically results in the opening of an investigation by DOJ into the allegations made in the case.  So, a qui tam lawsuit is a means of bringing allegations of customs fraud to the attention of the government, and triggering a serious inquiry by the government into those allegations.

False Claims Act qui tam cases can be complicated, and many factors go into whether such a case can be successful.  In this article, we do not address the substance of the cases themselves.  Instead, we address a question we are commonly asked […]

VW to pay HIGHEST CBP PENALTY EVER, $1.45 Billion!

On January 11, 2017, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the Attorney General announced the largest criminal and civil settlement ever against Volkswagen (VW) that totaled $4.3 billion. The breakdown of the settlement was $2.8 billion for the criminal penalty and $1.45 billion for a combined civil penalty for both the CBP and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Volkswagen agreed to plead guilty to three felony criminal counts and pay the $2.8 billion dollar penalty. The $1.45 billion combined settlement was for EPA’s “claim for civil penalties against VW in connection with VW’s importation and sale of these cars” as well as CBP’s claim for customs fraud.

CBP’s part of the $1.45 billion settlement dealt with a violation of 19 U.S.C. §1952, which “prohibits persons, by fraud, gross negligence or negligence, from entering or introducing, attempting to introduce, or aiding and abetting the entry or introduction of merchandise into the commerce of the United States, by means of statements or acts that are material and false, or by means of omissions which are material”.

[…]

Go to Top